Sampson v. Lauretta et al
Filing
11
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting 9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/29/2012: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (sisS, COURT STAFF).
<![CDATA[
Case4:12-cv-03400-KAW Document9-1 Filed08/15/12 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
DONNA R, ZIEGLER [142415]
County Counsel
By: RAYMOND L. MACKAY [113230]
Senior Deputy County Counsel
Office of County Counsel, County of Alameda
1221 Oak Street, Suite 450
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 272-6700
Attorneys for Defendants County of Alameda,
Lisa Laureta and Katherine Moore, Specially Appearing
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)
10
11
KRISTA SAMPSON,
Case No.: C12-03400 KAW
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
LISA LAURETTA and ALAMEDA COUNTY
SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY,
16
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
ENLARGE TIME TO FILE
RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS
Civil L. R., Rule 6-3
Defendant.
17
18
Pursuant to the Civil Local Rules in proceedings before the United States District
19
Court for the Northern District of California, Rule 6-3, the Defendants County of
20
Alameda (sued herein as the "Alameda County Social Services Agency"), Lisa Laureta
21
and Katherine Moore, by way of special appearance, moved this Court for an Order
22
enlarging the time said Defendants may file responsive pleadings.
23
Good cause appearing, Defendants’ Motion is granted.
24
//
25
//
26
27
28
Order on Defendants’ Motion to Enlarge Time, Case No. C12-03400 KAW
1
Case4:12-cv-03400-KAW Document9-1 Filed08/15/12 Page2 of 2
1
Said Defendants have up to and until Wednesday, September 12, 2012 to file
2
and serve responsive pleadings.
3
DATED:
August 29, 2012
4
5
6
_____________________________
The Hon. Kandis A. Westmore
Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order on Defendants’ Motion to Enlarge Time, Case No. C12-03400 KAW
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
