McCoy v. Wong
Filing
6
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/30/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
8
9
DANNY MCCOY,
No. C-12-3874 TEH (PR)
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
MATTHEW ANDERSON,
13
Defendant.
14
________________________________/
15
No. C-12-3875 TEH (PR)
DANNY MCCOY,
16
17
18
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS
Plaintiff,
V.
IAN WONG,
Defendant.
19
/
20
21
Plaintiff Danny McCoy, an inmate at Lompoc Federal Prison
22
23
located in Lompoc, California, has filed two pro se complaints under
24
42 U.S.C. § 1983 in which he applies to proceed in forma pauperis
25
(IFP) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
26
granted.
27
The total filing fee due is $ 350.00 for each case and the initial
28
partial filing fee due at this time is $ 0.00.
His applications to proceed IFP are
(Case No. 3874 TEH, Doc. #2; Case No. 3875 TEH, Doc. #3).
See 28 U.S.C.
1
§ 1915(b)(1).
2
will be sent to Plaintiff, the prison trust account office and the
3
Court’s financial office
A copy of this Order and the attached instructions
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
DATED
08/30/2012
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
G:\PRO-SE\TEH\CR.12\McCoy-12-3874&12-3875 IFP Grant.wpd
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
INSTRUCTIONS FOR PAYMENT OF PRISONER’S FILING FEE
4
5
6
The prisoner shown as the Plaintiff or Petitioner on the attached
Order has filed a civil action in forma pauperis in this Court and
owes to the Court a filing fee. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the
fee is to be paid as follows:
7
The initial partial filing fee listed on the attached Order
should be deducted by the prison trust account office from
the prisoner’s trust account and forwarded to the Clerk of
the Court as the first installment payment on the filing fee.
This amount is twenty percent of the greater of (a) the
average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account for the
six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the
Complaint/Petition or (b) the average monthly balance in the
prisoner’s account for the six-month period immediately
preceding the filing of the Complaint/Petition.
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
Thereafter, on a monthly basis, 20 percent of the preceding
month’s income credited to the prisoner’s trust account
should be deducted and forwarded to the Court each time the
amount in the account exceeds ten dollars ($10.00). The
prison trust account office should continue to do this until
the filing fee has been paid in full.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
If the prisoner does not have sufficient funds in his/her account
to pay the initial partial filing fee, the prison trust account
office should forward the available funds, and carry the balance
forward each month until the amount is fully paid.
If the prisoner has filed more than one Complaint, (s)he is
required to pay a filing fee for each case. The trust account
office should make the monthly calculations and payments for each
case in which it receives an order granting in forma pauperis and
these instructions.
24
The prisoner’s name and case number must be noted on each
remittance. The initial partial filing fee is due within thirty
days of the date of the attached Order. Checks should be made
payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court and sent to Prisoner
Accounts Receivable, U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue,
Box 36060, San Francisco, CA 94102.
25
cc:
22
23
26
27
28
Plaintiff/Petitioner
Finance Office
(rev. 1/07)
3
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
