Austin v. Shumakher et al
Filing
13
ORDER Extending Deadlines by Judge Edward M. Chen. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service). (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
LAMONT DELVON AUSTIN,
9
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C-12-0456 EMC (pr)
DEPUTY SHUMAKHER, SAN
FRANCISCO SHERIFF'S DEPT.,
12
13
Defendants.
___________________________________/
14
15
16
Defendant's request for an extension of time to file an answer and a dispositive motion is
17
GRANTED. (Docket # 10.) The answer filed on July 25, 2012 is deemed timely filed. The Court
18
now sets these new deadlines for the dispositive motions:
19
a.
No later than December 14, 2012, Defendant must file and serve a motion for
20
summary judgment or other dispositive motion. If Defendant is of the opinion that this case cannot
21
be resolved by summary judgment or other dispositive motion, Defendant must so inform the Court
22
prior to the date the motion is due.
23
24
25
26
27
28
b.
Plaintiff's opposition to the summary judgment or other dispositive motion
must be filed with the Court and served upon Defendant no later than January 18, 2013.
c.
Defendant's reply brief, if any must be filed no later than February 1, 2013.
Although the Court provided a Rand notice regarding summary judgment in the order of
service, Defendant must provide to Plaintiff a new Rand notice regarding summary judgment at the
1
time he files a motion for summary judgment. See Woods v. Carey, No. 09-15548, slip op. 7871,
2
7874 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012).
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: August 1, 2012
7
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
