Hoeper v. City & County of San Francisco Department of Public Health Jail Health Services et al

Filing 24

ORDER GIVING ADDITIONAL NOTICE; DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/02/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 LESLIE RICHARD HOEPER, No. C-11-0683 TEH (PR) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GIVING ADDITIONAL NOTICE; DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS 9 v. 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCSICO, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 / 15 16 In Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 953-954 (9th Cir. 1998) 17 (en banc), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th 18 Cir. 1988), the Ninth Circuit held that pro se prisoner litigants 19 must be given a warning about the requirements of Rule 56 of the 20 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure pertaining to summary judgment and 21 the consequences of such a motion. 22 1108, 1120 n. 4 (9th Cir. 2003), the court required somewhat similar 23 warning about unenumerated motions to dismiss for failure to 24 exhaust. 25 of service for prisoner pro se civil rights complaints. 26 In Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d This court routinely provides these warnings in its orders The Ninth Circuit now has held that the notices must be 27 provided at the time the motions are filed, and that notices given 28 in advance of such motions are not sufficient. Woods v. Carey, No 1 09-15548, slip op. 7871, 7874 (July 6, 2012). 2 to all pending cases. 3 have moved for summary judgment. 4 motion and the time for him to do so has long passed. 5 motion for summary judgment was filed before the opinion in Woods 6 came down, of course the Rand notice was not given with the motion 7 as required by Woods. 8 9 Id. at 7885. The new rule applies In this case the defendants Plaintiff has not opposed the Because the Plaintiff shall take notice of the following warning: Plaintiff is advised that a motion for summary judgment under Rule 10 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end 11 your case. 12 motion for summary judgment. 13 granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact - that is, 14 if there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect the 15 result of your case, the party who asked for summary judgment is 16 entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will end your case. 17 When a party you are suing makes a motion for summary judgment that 18 is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn testimony), 19 you cannot simply rely on what your complaint says. 20 must set out specific facts in declarations, depositions, answers to 21 interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as provided in Rule 22 56(e), that contradicts the facts shown in the Defendants’ 23 declarations and documents and show that there is a genuine issue of 24 material fact for trial. 25 opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate, may be entered against 26 you. 27 and there will be no trial. 28 Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a Generally, summary judgment must be Instead, you If you do not submit your own evidence in If summary judgment is granted, your case will be dismissed Rand, 154 F.3d at 962-63 (App. A). 2 1 If, after considering the above warning, Plaintiff wishes 2 to file an opposition, he shall do so by August 30, 2012. 3 Plaintiff makes a supplemental filing, defendants may file a reply 4 within fourteen days of service of the supplemental filing. 5 If IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 DATED 7 08/02/2012 THELTON E. HENDERSON United States District Judge 8 9 10 G:\PRO-SE\TEH\CR.11\Hoeper-11-0683-Woods Notice.wpd 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?