Kennedy v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., et al
Filing
78
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK. The application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of the instant order to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 10, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/10/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
For the Northern District of California
WILLIAM KENNEDY,
10
United States District Court
9
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA et al.,
Defendants.
/
14
15
No. C-11-0675 MMC
Before the Court is plaintiff William Kennedy’s application, filed August 8, 2012, to
proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.
Rule 24(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that a party
seeking to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal file an affidavit showing the party’s
“inability to pay or to give security for fees and costs,” claiming “an entitlement to redress,”
and stating “the issues that the party intends to present on appeal.” See Fed. R. App. P.
24(a)(1). Plaintiff fails to submit a statement of the issues he intends to present on appeal.
Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED.
The Clerk is hereby directed to send a copy of the instant order to the Court of
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Plaintiff is hereby advised he may file an application to
proceed in forma pauperis with the Ninth Circuit. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: August 10, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
