Polk v. Cavin et al
Filing
180
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S THIRD REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Plaintiff shall file her opposition on or before Friday, October 19, 2012. The deadline for defendants to file a reply remains as scheduled, specifically, within fifteen days of the date on which plaintiff's opposition is filed. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 10, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/10/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
SUSAN MAE POLK,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
No. C 08-1483 MMC (PR)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
THIRD REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
v.
DEPUTY JAMES CAVIN, et al.,
Defendants.
/
16
17
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, plaintiff’s third request for an extension of time to file
18
an opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment, which request has not been
19
opposed by defendants, is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file her opposition on or
20
before Friday, October 19, 2012. The deadline for defendants to file a reply remains
21
as scheduled, specifically, within fifteen days of the date on which plaintiff’s
22
opposition is filed.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: August 10, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
