Williams v. Kernan et al
Filing
94
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR A SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Plaintiff shall file his opposition on or before Friday, October 26, 2012. The deadline for defendants to file a reply remains as scheduled, specifically, within fourteen days of the date on which plaintiff's opposition is filed. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 21, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/21/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
MICHAEL PAUL WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
No. C 07-5574 MMC (PR)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR A SECOND
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
v.
SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,
Defendants.
/
16
17
Before the Court is plaintiff’s request, filed August 6, 2012, for a second extension of
18
time to file an opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Defendants have
19
not filed a response thereto.
20
The Court having read and considered plaintiff’s request, and good cause appearing
21
therefor, the request is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his opposition on or before
22
Friday, October 26, 2012. The deadline for defendants to file a reply remains as
23
scheduled, specifically, within fourteen days of the date on which plaintiff’s
24
opposition is filed.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED
26
27
28
Dated: August 21, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
