(PC) Davis v. Calvin et al, No. 2:2007cv01383 - Document 16 (E.D. Cal. 2007)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING in Full 9 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Morrison C. England Jr. on 12/4/07. Pltf's 4 motion for a prelim injunction is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A) Modified on 12/7/2007 (Kastilahn, A).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Davis v. Calvin et al Doc. 16 Case 2:07-cv-01383-FCD-EFB Document 16 Filed 12/05/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES T. DAVIS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-07-1383 MCE EFB P D. CALVIN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On October 9, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72- 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 25 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 26 proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-01383-FCD-EFB Document 16 Filed 12/05/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 9, 2007, are adopted in full; 3 4 5 and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction is denied. Dated: December 4, 2007 6 7 8 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
