2007 Eastern District of California US Federal District Court Case Law
(HC) Wilson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Date: December 6, 2007
Docket Number: 1:2007cv01703
Date: December 6, 2007
Docket Number: 1:2007cv01703
(HC) Pedraza v. The People of the State of California
Date: December 6, 2007
Docket Number: 1:2007cv01710
Date: December 6, 2007
Docket Number: 1:2007cv01710
(HC) Hailassie v. United States of America et al
Date: October 24, 2007
Docket Number: 1:2007cv01509
Date: October 24, 2007
Docket Number: 1:2007cv01509
(HC) Rodriguez v. Superior Court of Fresno County
Date: October 4, 2007
Docket Number: 1:2007cv01403
Date: October 4, 2007
Docket Number: 1:2007cv01403
(HC) Muratalla-Lua v. The People of the State of California
Date: August 17, 2007
Docket Number: 1:2007cv01142
Date: August 17, 2007
Docket Number: 1:2007cv01142
Grimmway Enterprises, Inc. v. PIC Fresh Global, Inc., et al.
Date: August 15, 2007
Docket Number: 1:2007cv00109
Date: August 15, 2007
Docket Number: 1:2007cv00109
(HC)Alvis Vernon Rhodes v. Stanislaus County Superior Court
Date: August 3, 2007
Docket Number: 1:2007cv01050
Date: August 3, 2007
Docket Number: 1:2007cv01050
(PC} Johnson v. California Correctional Peace Officers Association
Date: February 26, 2007
Docket Number: 2:2007cv00277
Date: February 26, 2007
Docket Number: 2:2007cv00277
(HC) Staich v. California Board of Prison Hearings Chairman
Date: February 1, 2007
Docket Number: 2:2007cv00171
Date: February 1, 2007
Docket Number: 2:2007cv00171
(WMW) Roger D. Romero v. Citibank (South Dakota), NA
Date: January 31, 2007
Docket Number: 1:2007cv00164
Date: January 31, 2007
Docket Number: 1:2007cv00164
(PC) Soto v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Date: January 30, 2007
Docket Number: 2:2007cv00155
Date: January 30, 2007
Docket Number: 2:2007cv00155
Evans v. Department of Fair Employment and Housing
Date: January 3, 2007
Docket Number: 1:2006cv01890
Date: January 3, 2007
Docket Number: 1:2006cv01890
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.