(HC) Hally v. Felker et al, No. 2:2007cv00889 - Document 3 (E.D. Cal. 2007)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/17/07 Recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to the U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Within twenty days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Petitioner may file written objections with the Court. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Hally v. Felker et al Doc. 3 Case 2:07-cv-00889-MCE-KJM Document 3 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JABAR HALLY, Petitioner, 12 13 No. CIV S-07-0889 MCE KJM P Respondents. 11 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS vs. T. FELKER, 14 / 15 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 16 17 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Court records reveal that petitioner has previously 18 filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus attacking the conviction and sentence challenged 19 in this case.1 The previous application was filed on March 29, 2004, and was denied on the 20 merits on April 2, 2007. Before petitioner can proceed with the instant application he must move 21 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for an order authorizing the district 22 court to consider the application. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3). Therefore, petitioner's application 23 must be dismissed without prejudice to its refiling upon obtaining authorization from the United 24 States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. 25 26 1 Hally v. Scribner, CIV-S-04-0828 RRB CMK P. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-00889-MCE-KJM Filed 05/18/2007 Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed 1 2 Document 3 without prejudice. 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 4 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty 5 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 6 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's 7 Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the 8 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 9 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 DATED: May 17, 2007. 11 12 13 1 hall0889.suc 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
