Gomes v. Michaels Stores, Inc. et al, No. 2:2006cv01921 - Document 30 (E.D. Cal. 2007)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 01/03/2007 re 26 ORDERING that final judgment is entered in favor of defendant Broadspire. Dft Kristine Blas is deemed to no longer be a party to this case. Plts shall take nothing by their complaint and said dfts shall recover their costs of suit according to proof. The hearing set for 1/16/2007 is hereby VACATED. (Duong, D) Modified on 1/4/2007 (Duong, D).

Download PDF
Gomes v. Michaels Stores, Inc. et al Doc. 30 Case 2:06-cv-01921-LKK-KJM Document 30 Filed 01/04/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARLENE GOMES, NO. CIV. S-06-1921 LKK/KJM 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. O R D E R 14 15 16 17 MICHAELS STORES, INC.; BROADSPIRE SERVICES, INC.; KRISTINE BLAS AND DOES 1-100, Defendants. / 18 19 Pending on the January 16, 2007 law and motion calendar is a 20 motion for entry of final judgment as to defendants Broadspire 21 Services, Inc. and Kristine Blas. 22 non-opposition. 23 and without oral argument. 24 Plaintiff filed a statement of The court decides the matter based on the papers On October 26, 2006, the court dismissed defendant Kristine 25 Blas as fraudulently joined. On November 16, 2006, the court 26 granted Broadspire's motion to dismiss. Therefore, all claims 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:06-cv-01921-LKK-KJM Document 30 Filed 01/04/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 asserted against Kristine Blas and Broadspire have been finally 2 resolved. 3 Accordingly, final judgment is entered in favor of defendant 4 Broadspire. Defendant Kristine Blas is deemed to no longer be a 5 party to this case. 6 complaint and said defendants shall recover their costs of suit 7 according to proof. Plaintiffs shall take nothing by their 8 The hearing set for January 16, 2007 is hereby VACATED. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 DATED: January 3, 2007. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.