(PC) Norwood v. Alameida, et al, No. 2:2003cv02554 - Document 105 (E.D. Cal. 2007)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. on 3/29/07 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 103 are ADOPTED IN FULL. Pltf's claims for injunctive relief are mooted by summary judgment which is entered for dfts on those claims; and dfts' 3/26/06 motion for summary judgment 79 on pltf's damage claim that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated when he was deprived of outdoor exercise during the four lockdown periods is DENIED. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
(PC) Norwood v. Alameida, et al Doc. 105 Case 2:03-cv-02554-GEB-GGH Document 105 Filed 03/30/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY LYNN NORWOOD, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 2:03-cv-2554-GEB-GGH-P vs. EDWARD ALAMEIDA, JR., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. 19 On March 5, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:03-cv-02554-GEB-GGH Document 105 Filed 03/30/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 5, 2007, are adopted in full; 2 2. Plaintiff’s claims for injunctive relief are mooted by summary judgment which 3 4 is entered for defendants on those claims; and 3. Defendants’ March 23, 2006, motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s 5 damage claim that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated when he was deprived of outdoor 6 exercise during the four lockdown periods is denied. 7 Dated: March 29, 2007 8 9 10 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.