Kimbro v. Chen et al
Filing
6
ORDER to Resubmit Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis or Pay Filing Fee within 45 Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 6/16/11. (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application). (Verduzco, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICHARD KIMBRO,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
1:11-cv-00957-GBC (PC)
ORDER TO RESUBMIT APPLICATION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
OR PAY FILING FEE WITHIN 45 DAYS
v.
CHEN, et al.,
Defendants.
/
16
17
18
ORDER
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42
19
U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not paid the $350.00 filing fee. It appears that he attempted to
20
submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, but it is incomplete. (ECF No. 2.)
21
However, it does not “authorize the agency having custody of [Plaintiff] to collect from [his]
22
trust account and forward to the Clerk of the United States District Court payments in
23
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2)” or similar language.
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
25
Within forty-five (45) days of the date of service of this Order, Plaintiff shall submit
26
the attached application to proceed in forma pauperis, completed and signed, or in the
27
alternative, pay the $350.00 filing fee for this action. No requests for extension will be
28
granted without a showing of good cause. Within sixty (60) days of the date of service
-1-
1
of this Order, Plaintiff shall submit a certified copy of his/her prison trust statement for the
2
six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.
Failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of this action.
3
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated:
1j0bbc
June 16, 2011
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
