Tate v. Cate et al
Filing
50
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Request for a Copy of the Scheduling Order 49 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/23/11. (Attachments: # 1 Doc 33 Discovery and Scheduling Order) (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LARRY TATE,
12
13
14
Case No. 1:09-cv-00770 JLT (PC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR A COPY OF THE
SCHEDULING ORDER
vs.
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
15
(Doc. 49)
Defendants.
16
/
17
On June 17, 2011, Plaintiff filed a request for a copy of the Court’s scheduling order issued on
18
March 16, 2011. Plaintiff explains that his copy of the scheduling order was somehow “dislocated.”
19
(Doc. 49 at 2.)
20
Good cause appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
21
1.
22
23
Plaintiff’s June 17, 2011 request for a copy of the Court’s scheduling order (Doc. 49) is
GRANTED; and
2.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff a one-time courtesy copy of the
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: June 23, 2011
9j7khi
27
28
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?