Tate v. Cate et al

Filing 50

ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Request for a Copy of the Scheduling Order 49 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/23/11. (Attachments: # 1 Doc 33 Discovery and Scheduling Order) (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY TATE, 12 13 14 Case No. 1:09-cv-00770 JLT (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR A COPY OF THE SCHEDULING ORDER vs. MATTHEW CATE, et al., 15 (Doc. 49) Defendants. 16 / 17 On June 17, 2011, Plaintiff filed a request for a copy of the Court’s scheduling order issued on 18 March 16, 2011. Plaintiff explains that his copy of the scheduling order was somehow “dislocated.” 19 (Doc. 49 at 2.) 20 Good cause appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. 22 23 Plaintiff’s June 17, 2011 request for a copy of the Court’s scheduling order (Doc. 49) is GRANTED; and 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff a one-time courtesy copy of the 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: June 23, 2011 9j7khi 27 28 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?