(PC) Abdalla v. Kramer, et al, No. 1:2002cv05453 - Document 129 (E.D. Cal. 2007)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS 108 Dr. Cammiso SCC and Dr. Daly SCC terminated. case referred back to Magsitrate Juge Snyder for further proceedings. signed by Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/16/07. (Kusamura, W)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Abdalla v. Kramer, et al Doc. 129 Case 1:02-cv-05453-LJO-SMS Document 129 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MOHAMED ABDALLA, 12 1:02-cv-05453-LJO-SMS-P ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 108) Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 KRAMER, ET. AL., 15 ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN DEFENDANTS Defendants. / 16 17 Mohamed Abdalla (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding 18 pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 21 Rule 72-302. 22 The matter was referred to a United States On June 2, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and 23 Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which 24 contained notice to the parties that any objections to the 25 Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20) 26 days. 27 Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations. 28 // On June 19, 2006, Plaintiff filed objections to the 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:02-cv-05453-LJO-SMS 1 Document 129 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 2 of 2 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2 § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a 3 de novo review of this case. 4 entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to 5 be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. 8 Having carefully reviewed the The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 2, 2006, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and, 9 2. Plaintiff’s request to dismiss Defendant Cammiso from 10 the action is GRANTED, and Defendant Daly is also DISMISSED from 11 the action for failure to effect service. The action is referred 12 back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 Dated: b9ed48 February 16, 2007 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
