RAC Development, Inc. v. Jacqueline Badio et al
Filing
6
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. For the reasons stated in the order, the Court finds that it lacks jurisdiction and REMANDS this case to Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 13P 02233. See Order for details. Case Terminated. Made JS-6, (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (Attachments: # 1 Certified copies of docket sheet adn ORder to Remand sent to State Court) (cch) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/27/2013: # 2 certified docket sheet) (cch). Modified on 8/27/2013 (cch). (Attachment 2 replaced on 8/27/2013) (cch). Modified on 8/27/2013 (cch). (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/27/2013) (cch). (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/27/2013) (cch).
<![CDATA[
CM/ECF - California Central District
1 of 2
https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?645739395377523-L_1_0-1
(AJWx),CLOSED,DISCOVERY,MANADR,RELATED-G,REMANDED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
(Western Division - Los Angeles)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:13-cv-06133-ODW-AJW
RAC Development, Inc. v. Jacqueline Badio et al
Assigned to: Judge Otis D. Wright, II
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich
Related Case: 2:13-cv-05739-ODW-AJW
Case in other court: Superior Court of CA, Los Angeles County,
13P02233
Cause: 28:1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure
Date Filed: 08/21/2013
Date Terminated: 08/26/2013
Jury Demand: Defendant
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Plaintiff
RAC Development, Inc.
represented by Roman Otkupman
Precision Legal Center ALC
5950 Canoga Avenue Suite 550
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
818-293-5623
Fax: 888-850-1310
Email: rotkupman@gmail.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
V.
Defendant
Jacqueline Badio
represented by Jacqueline Badio
1071 Avoca Ave.
Pasadena, CA 91105
PRO SE
Defendant
Does
1-10
Date Filed
# Docket Text
08/21/2013
1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from the Superior Court of CA, Los Angeles County, case
number 13P02233 with conformed copies of summons and complaint. Case assigned to
Judge Margaret M. Morrow, discovery to Magistrate Judge Jay C Gandhi; (Filing fee $
400 PAID ); filed by defendant Jacqueline Badio.(esa) (Entered: 08/23/2013)
08/21/2013
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint 1 , Jury Trial Demanded, filed by
defendant Jacqueline Badio.(esa) (Entered: 08/23/2013)
8/27/2013 10:26 AM
CM/ECF - California Central District
2 of 2
https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?645739395377523-L_1_0-1
08/21/2013
2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by defendant
Jacqueline Badio. (esa) (Entered: 08/23/2013)
08/21/2013
3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed.(esa) (Entered:
08/23/2013)
08/26/2013
4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff RAC Development, Inc.. Related Case(s):
2:13-cv-05739-ODW-AJW (Otkupman, Roman) (Entered: 08/26/2013)
08/26/2013
5 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 08-05 -Related Casefiled. Related Case No: CV 13-05739 ODW(AJWx). Case transferred from Magistrate
Judge Jay C. Gandhi and Judge Margaret M. Morrow to Judge Otis D. Wright, II and
Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich for all further proceedings. The case number will
now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 13-06133 ODW(AJWx). Signed by
Judge Otis D. Wright, II (rn) (Entered: 08/27/2013)
08/26/2013
6 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT by
Judge Otis D. Wright, II. For the reasons stated in the order, the Court finds that it lacks
jurisdiction and REMANDS this case to Los Angeles County Superior Court, case
number 13P02233. Case Terminated. Made JS-6, (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.)
(Attachments: # 1 Mailed letter to Superior Court with certified docket sheet and order)
(cch) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/27/2013: # 2 certified docket sheet) (cch).
Modified on 8/27/2013 (cch). (Entered: 08/27/2013)
8/27/2013 10:26 AM
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
