Payam Piroozmehr v. Zale Delaware, Inc. et al
Filing
11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: On 4/24/2012, the Court issued an order to show cause in the complaint regarding why the action should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction 9 . On 5/14/2012, defendants filed a response, stating that defendants do not contest the remand issue 10 . Accordingly, the case is hereby REMANDED to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case Number LC096468. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6 ) Court Reporter: N/A. (Attachments: # 1 CV-103 Remand Transmittal Letter) (gk)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 12-3121 CAS (CWx)
Title
PAYAM PIROOZMEHR v. ZALE DELAWARE, INC., ET AL.
Present: The Honorable
Date
May 17, 2012
CHRISTINA A. SNYDER
CATHERINE JEANG
Deputy Clerk
N/A
Court Reporter / Recorder
N/A
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
N/A
N/A
Proceedings:
(In Chambers:) ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO LOS
ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
JS-6
I.
INTRODUCTION
On April 24, 2012, the Court issued an order to show cause in the above-captioned
complaint regarding why the action should not be remanded for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 9. On May 14, 2012, defendants filed a response, stating that
defendants do not contest the remand issue. Dkt. No. 10. Accordingly, the case is hereby
REMANDED to Los Angeles County Superior Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
00
Initials of
Preparer
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
:
00
IM
Page 1 of 1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
