Vincent Magallanes et al v. Pillar Hotels and Resorts Gen-Par LLC et al
Filing
17
ORDER by Judge John A Kronstadt remanding case to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Central Division. Case number BC477037. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (Attachments: # 1 Remand Letter) (rne)
1
2
3
4
5
JS-6
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
VINCENT MAGALLANES and
MARCELLO MAGALLANES,
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
PILLAR HOTELS AND RESORTS
GEN-PAR, L.L.C.; PILLAR HOTELS
16 AND RESORTS, L.P.;
INTERMOUNTAIN MANAGEMENT,
17 L.L.C.; KELLY GARCIA, an
individual; and DOES 1 through 100,
18 inclusive,
15
19
Case No. CV12-1872 JAK (PJWx)
---------[PROPOSED] ORDER REMANDING
CASE TO STATE COURT
Complaint Filed: January 31, 2012
Trial Date:
None
Dist. Judge:
Hon. John A. Kronstadt
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12395762_1.DOC
Case No. CV12-1872 JAK (PJWx)
[PROPOSED] ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT
ORDER
1
2
Having read and considered the Joint Stipulation Remanding Case to State
3
Court filed by the Parties, and GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY
4
ORDERED THAT:
5
1.
Based on the Parties' stipulation, the above-referenced action (Case No.
6
CV12-1872 JAK (PJWx)) is hereby remanded to the Superior Court for the State of
7
California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC477037.
8
9
10
11
12
2.
The Court acknowledges that Plaintiffs have taken off calendar their
pending Motion for Remand and request for attorneys’ fees, which was set for
hearing on June 4, 2012.
3.
The Court acknowledges that Defendants have taken off calendar their
pending Motion to Dismiss, which was set for hearing on June 4, 2012.
13
4.
All pending hearings and deadlines are vacated.
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
May 18, 2012
Dated: ____________
______________________________
The Honorable John A. Kronstadt
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12395762_1.DOC
1
Case No. CV12-1872 JAK (PJWx)
[PROPOSED] ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?