Richard Lee et al v. Alfa Laval Inc et al
Filing
6
ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR REMAND by Judge George H. King remanding case to Superior Court for the State of California, Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Los Angeles, California, Case number BC465990. IT is hereby, ORDERED, that this matter is REMANDED forthwith. Certified copies of docket sheet and Order to Remand sent to State Court. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (Attachments: # 1 Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court) (lw)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Joseph C. Maher II, Esq. (CSBN 164117)
Cindy Young Saxey, Esq. (CSBN 252257)
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
1880 Century Park East, Suite 700
Los Angeles, California 90067
Tel.: (310) 247-0921
Fax: (310) 786-9927
Email: jmaher@weitzlux.com
Email: csaxey@weitzlux.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
FILED: 9/12/11
JS-6
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
LAW OFFICES
1880 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 700
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067
WEITZ & LUXENBERG P.C.
11
RICHARD LEE, an individual; and
MARY LEE, an individual;
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. CV11-07333 GHK (SSx)
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON
STIPULATION FOR REMAND
v.
ALFA LAVAL, INC., individually and
as successor in interest to THE
DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY
and SHARPLES CORPORATION;
CALPORTLAND COMPANY, f/k/a
CALIFORNIA PORTLAND CEMENT
COMPANY;
CBS CORPORATION f/k/a VIACOM,
INC., successor by merger to CBS
CORPORATION f/k/a
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC
CORPORATION;
CERTAINTEED CORPORATION;
CLARK-RELIANCE CORPORATION,
individually and as successor in interest
to JERGUSON GAGE & VALVE
COMPANY;
CRANE CO.;
CSR, LTD., f/k/a COLONIAL SUGAR
REFINING COMPANY, INC. OF
-1________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR REMAND
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
LAW OFFICES
1880 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 700
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067
WEITZ & LUXENBERG P.C.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
SYDNEY AUSTRLIA;
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, a/k/a and
individually and as successor in interest
to FOSTER WHEELER
CORPORATION and FOSTER
WHEELER ENERGY
CORPORATION;
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY
CORPORATION, a/k/a and
individually and as successor in interest
to FOSTER WHEELER
CORPORATION and FOSTER
WHEELER, LLC;
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY;
GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC, f/k/a
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION;
HILL BROTHERS CHEMICAL
COMPANY;
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY;
KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC.;
KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY,
INC.;
METALCLAD INSULATION
CORPORATION;
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., individually
and as successor in interest to OWENSILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY;
O-I, INC., individually and as successor
in interest to OWENS-ILLINOIS
GLASS COMPANY;
RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION;
SOCO-WEST, INC. f/k/a BRENNTAG
WEST, INC. f/k/a SOCO-LYNCH
CORPORATION, successor in interest
to WESTERN CHEMICAL &
MANUFACTURING CO.;
SYD CARPENTER, MARINE
CONTRACTOR, INC.;
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION;
YARWAY CORPORATION;
28
-2________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR REMAND
1
and DOES 1 through 400, inclusive,
2
3
4
Defendants.
THIS MATTER HAVING COME BEFORE THE COURT by the Joint
5
6
Stipulation to Remand this case to the Superior Court for the State of California,
7
Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, by and between counsel for Plaintiffs and
8
counsel for Defendant Crane Co. in the above referenced matter,
9
10
It is hereby, ORDERED, that this matter is REMANDED forthwith.
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
LAW OFFICES
1880 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 700
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067
WEITZ & LUXENBERG P.C.
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
15
16
DATED: September 9, 2011
17
18
Honorable George H. King
Judge of the United States District Court
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR REMAND
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
