American Silicon Technologies v. United States, No. 96-10 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1999)

 Annotate this Case

The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on November 28, 2000.
 The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on August 8, 2000.
 The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on April 26, 2000.
 The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on April 12, 2000.
 The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on March 8, 2000.
 The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on February 8, 2000.
 The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on January 26, 2001.
 The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on July 30, 2002.
 The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on January 3, 2003.

Download PDF
Slip Op. 99-17 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : AMERICAN SILICON TECHNOLOGIES, ELKEM METALS COMPANY, GLOBE METALLURGICAL, INC., and SKW METALS & ALLOYS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and COMPANHIA FERROLIGAS MINAS GERAIS-MINASLIGAS and ELETROSILEX BELO HORIZONTE, Before: MUSGRAVE, JUDGE Court No. 96-10-02313 : Defendant-Intervenors. : : : : JUDGMENT Upon having received and reviewed the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration s ( Commerce ) Silicon Metal From Brazil, Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, American Silicon Technologies v. United States, Court No. 96-10-02313, Slip Op. 98-110 (July 30, 1998) ( Remand Results ) filed December 16, 1998, upon finding that Commerce complied with the Court s remand order, and upon review of Plaintiffs Comments on Department of Commerce Final Remand Results, it is hereby Court No. 96-10-02313 Page 2 ORDERED that the Remand Results are affirmed in their entirety; and it is further ORDERED that, all other issues having been decided, this case is dismissed. _______________________________ R. KENTON MUSGRAVE JUDGE Dated: February 17, 1999 New York, New York

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.