Home Prods., Int'l, Inc. v. United States, No. 11-00104 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2012)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on January 6, 2012.

Download PDF
Slip Op. 12-84 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE HOME PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, Before: Leo M. Gordon, Judge v. Consol. Court No. 11-00104 UNITED STATES, Defendant. JUDGMENT This consolidated action is presently on remand to the U.S. Department of Commerce ( Commerce ) pursuant to Home Products Int l, Inc. v. United States, 36 CIT ___, Slip. Op. 12-60 (May 3, 2012), to address an issue raised by Plaintiff, Home Products International Inc. ( HPI ). HPI has since moved to voluntarily dismiss its portion of this consolidated action pursuant to USCIT Rule 41(a)(2). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that HPI s portion of this consolidated action is dismissed, rendering the remand proceedings moot; it is further ORDERED that HPI s motion for Since Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. to post security, see ECF No. 67, is denied; it is further ORDERED that HPI s motion to dissolve the injunction against liquidation of the subject entries, see ECF No. 95, is denied; it is further ORDERED that final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order covering Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables from China. See Floor- Consol. Court No. 11-00104 Page 2 Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof from the People s Republic of China, 76 Fed. Reg. 15,295 (Dep t of Commerce Mar. 21, 2011) (final results admin. review), are sustained, except for the matters covered by the Final Results of Redetermination (Dep t of Commerce Mar. 14, 2012) ( Remand Results ), ECF No. 83; it is further ORDERED that the Remand Results are sustained; and it is further ORDERED that the subject entries enjoined in this action, see Since Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court No. 11-001051 (USCIT Apr. 29, 2011) (order granting consent motion for preliminary injunction), ECF No. 14, must be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision, including all appeals, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. ยง 1516a(e) (2006). /s/ Leo M. Gordon Judge Leo M. Gordon Dated: June 14, 2012 New York, New York 1 Consolidated under Court No. 11-00104.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.