PT Pindo Deli Pulp and Paper Mills v. United States, No. 10-00370 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2012)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Slip Op. 12- 34 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE PT PINDO DELI PULP and PAPER MILLS, Plaintiff, Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge v. Court No. 10-00370 UNITED STATES, Defendant, and APPLETON COATED LLC, NEWPAGE CORPORATION, S.D. WARREN COMPANY d/b/a SAPPI FINE PAPER NORTH AMERICA, UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFLCIO-CLC, Intervenor Defendants. [Plaintiff-Respondent PT Pindo Deli Pulp and Paper Mills motion for judgment on the agency record in countervailing duty order scope matter denied.] Dated: March 16, 2012 Daniel L. Porter and James P. Durling, Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff. With them on the brief were Matthew P. McCullough and Ross E. Bidlingmaier. Alexander V. Sverdlov, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant. With him on the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Patricia M. McCarthy, Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was David Richardson, International Office of the Chief Counsel for Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, of Washington, DC. Court No. 10-00370 Page 2 William A. Fennell, Stewart and Stewart of Washington, DC, and Gilbert B. Kaplan, King & Spalding, LLP, of Washington DC, argued for intervenor defendants. With them on the brief were Elizabeth J. Drake and Terence P. Stewart, Stewart and Stewart, of Washington, DC, and Jeffrey M. Telep, Brian E. McGill, and Christopher T. Cloutier, King & Spalding, LLP, of Washington, DC. ORDER This case having been duly submitted for decision; and the court, after due deliberation, having rendered a decision herein; Now therefore, in conformity with the decision issued in Court No. 10-00369, Slip Op. 12-33, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff PT Pindo Deli and Paper Mills motion for judgment on the agency record is denied and the challenged determination of Commerce is SUSTAINED. /s/ Jane A. Restani Jane A. Restani Judge Dated this 16th day of March, 2012. New York, New York.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
