China Kingdom Imp. & Exp. Co. v. United States, No. 03-00302 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2008)

 Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on September 4, 2007.

Download PDF
Slip Op. 08-96 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE CHINA KINGDOM IMPORT & EXPORT CO., LTD.; YANCHENG YAOU SEAFOOD CO., LTD.; and QINGDAO ZHENGRI SEAFOOD CO., LTD., Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Judge Plaintiffs, Court No. 03-00302 v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. JUDGMENT The court has reviewed the Results of Redetermination on Remand Pursuant to China Kingdom Import & Export Co., Ltd. v. United States ( Remand Redetermination ), as filed by the International Trade Administration, United States Department of Commerce ( Commerce ), on March 4, 2008. The court concludes that the Remand Redetermination complies with the Opinion and Order issued in this case. See China Kingdom Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. v. United States, 31 CIT __, 507 F. Supp. 2d. 1337 (2007). No plaintiff submitted comments on the draft version of the Remand Redetermination released by Commerce on February 1, 2008. Remand Redetermination 2. Pursuant to the court s Order of September 4, 2007, comments of plaintiffs on the Remand Redetermination were required to be filed with the court within 30 days of the filing of the Remand Redetermination. No plaintiff has filed such comments. Under these circumstances, the court presumes the concurrence of all plaintiffs with the Remand Redetermination. Court No. 03-00302 Page 2 Upon the court s review of the Remand Redetermination, and all relevant papers and proceedings had herein, and upon due deliberation, it is hereby ORDERED that the Remand Redetermination is affirmed; and it is further ORDERED that, in accordance with 19 U.S.C. ยง 1516a(e), entries of merchandise that are affected by the Remand Redetermination shall be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision in this action. /s/ Timothy C. Stanceu Timothy C. Stanceu Judge Dated: September 12, 2008 New York, New York

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.