Crawfish Processors Alliance v. United States, No. 02-00376 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2008)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on May 6, 2004.

Download PDF

Slip Op. 08-27 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BEFORE: Senior Judge Nicholas Tsoucalas ________________________________________ CRAWFISH PROCESSORS ALLIANCE; : LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF : AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY; : BOB ODOM, COMMISSIONER, : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : UNITED STATES, : : Defendant, : : and : : HONTEX ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a : LOUISIANA PACKING COMPANY; : QINGDAO RIRONG FOODSTUFF CO., LTD. : and YANCHENG HAITENG AQUATIC : PRODUCTS & FOODS CO., LTD; : BO ASIA, INC., GRAND NOVA : INTERNATIONAL, INC., PACIFIC : COAST FISHERIES CORP., : FUJIAN PELAGIC FISHERY GROUP CO., : QINGDAO ZHENGRI SEAFOOD CO., LTD. : and YANGCHENG YAOU SEAFOOD CO., : : Defendant-Intervenors : and Plaintiffs. : ________________________________________: Consol. Court No. 02-00376 JUDGMENT Upon consideration of the Department of Commerce s Final Remand Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, filed with the Court on January 28, 2008 ( Final Results ), the Court finds that those remand results comply with the Court s remand order in Crawfish Processors Alliance v. United States, 31 CIT __, Slip Op. 07-156 (October 30, 2007) insofar as they treat Fujian Pelagic Fishery Group Co. ( Fujian ) and Pacific Coast Fisheries Corp. ( Pacific Coast ) as affiliated parties pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1677(33)(E). Having done so, Department of Commerce recalculated Fujian s dumping margin from 174.04% to 60.83% for the period September 1, 1999 through August 31, 2000, the period of review. No party objected to the Final Results. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that the Final Results are affirmed; and it is further ORDERED that since all other issues have been decided, this case is dismissed. SO ORDERED. /s/ Nicholas Tsoucalas NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS SENIOR JUDGE Dated: March 5, 2008 New York, New York

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.