TRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. AT&T INC. , No. 23-1246 (Fed. Cir. 2023)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 23-1246 Document: 74 Page: 1 Filed: 07/13/2023 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ TRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. AT&T INC., Defendant SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LP, SPRINT SPECTRUM, LP, SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC., VERIZON WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, LP, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2023-1246, 2023-1436 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 2:17-cv-00718-RWS-RSP, 2:17-cv-00719-RWS-RSP, 2:17-cv-00721-RWS-RSP, Judge Robert Schroeder III. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ WILLIAM PETERSON RAMEY, III, Ramey LLP, Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Case: 23-1246 Document: 74 Page: 2 Filed: 07/13/2023 BRIAN DAVID SCHMALZBACH, McGuireWoods LLP, Richmond, VA, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees Sprint Communications Company LP, Sprint Spectrum, LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc. also represented by DAVID EVAN FINKELSON; TYLER VANHOUTAN, Houston, TX. JACOB KEVIN BARON, Holland & Knight LLP, Boston, MA, for defendant-appellee Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP. Also represented by JOSHUA C. KRUMHOLZ, ALLISON LUCIER. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, HUGHES, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 13, 2023 Date /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow Jarrett B. Perlow Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.