SCHWENDIMANN v. NEENAH, INC. , No. 22-1951 (Fed. Cir. 2023)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 22-1951 Document: 49 Page: 1 Filed: 10/11/2023 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ JODI A. SCHWENDIMANN, Appellant v. NEENAH, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2022-1951, 2022-1952, 2022-1953 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR202001361, IPR2020-01363, IPR2021-00016. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DEVAN V. PADMANABHAN, Padmanabhan & Dawson PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHELLE DAWSON, BRITTA LOFTUS, PAUL J. ROBBENNOLT. JOSEPH J. RICHETTI, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by ALEXANDER DAVID WALDEN; K. LEE MARSHALL, San Francisco, CA. ______________________ Case: 22-1951 Document: 49 Page: 2 Filed: 10/11/2023 THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, STOLL and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 11, 2023 Date

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.