In Re UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME , No. 21-2269 (Fed. Cir. 2022)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 21-2269 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 12/12/2022 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME, Appellant ______________________ 2021-2269 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 15/074,339. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ MARTIN JAMES COSENZA, II, Pilloff Passino & Cosenza LLP, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellant University of Notre Dame. Also represented by SEAN ALLEN PASSINO, RACHEL KAREN PILLOFF. PETER JOHN SAWERT, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Case: 21-2269 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 12/12/2022 PER CURIAM (REYNA, MAYER, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 12, 2022 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.