INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC. v. AURIS HEALTH, INC. , No. 21-1473 (Fed. Cir. 2022)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 21-1473 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 03/14/2022 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC., Appellant v. AURIS HEALTH, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2021-1473 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR201901173. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JACOB ADAM SCHROEDER, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ARPITA BHATTACHARYYA; FRANK A. DECOSTA, III, Washington, DC; ROBERT KING HIGH, III, Atlanta, GA. CHING-LEE FUKUDA, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by THOMAS ANTHONY BROUGHAN, III, RYAN C. MORRIS, Washington, DC; PAUL J. ROGERSON, Chicago, IL. Case: 21-1473 Document: 51 Page: 2 Filed: 03/14/2022 ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, PROST, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 14, 2022 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.