BLACKBERRY LIMITED v. HIRSHFELD , No. 21-1124 (Fed. Cir. 2021)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 21-1124 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 11/08/2021 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BLACKBERRY LIMITED, Appellant v. ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________ 2021-1124 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR201900706. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JAMES M. GLASS, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by SEAN GLOTH, II; JAMES R. ASPERGER, Los Angeles, CA; FELIPE CORREDOR, SAM STEPHEN STAKE, San Francisco, CA, KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON, Redwood Shores, CA. Case: 21-1124 Document: 40 Page: 2 Filed: 11/08/2021 MONICA BARNES LATEEF, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by PETER J. AYERS, MICHAEL S. FORMAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 8, 2021 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.