In Re RAGHUBIR , No. 20-128 (Fed. Cir. 2020)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 20-128 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 06/18/2020 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ In re: VINODH RAGHUBIR, Petitioner ______________________ 2020-128 ______________________ On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:20-cv-00388-EGB, Senior Judge Eric G. Bruggink. ______________________ ON PETITION ______________________ PER CURIAM. ORDER Vinodh Raghubir currently has a case pending before the United States Court of Federal Claims. He now petitions for a writ of prohibition, asking this court to “prohibit conduct pursuant to ‘the conspiracy to predetermine the outcome of judicial proceedings’ throughout proceedings now involving the Federal Court of Claims.” Like a writ of mandamus, a writ of prohibition is a drastic remedy that is available only when a petitioner has a clear and indisputable right to relief and no adequate alternative legal channels through which to obtain that relief. See Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Dist. of Case: 20-128 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 06/18/2020 IN RE: RAGHUBIR 2 Columbia, 542 U.S. 367, 380–81 (2004); In re Missouri, 664 F.2d 178, 180 (8th Cir. 1981). Mr. Raghubir has not demonstrated that an appeal from an eventual final judgment of the Court of Federal Claims would be inadequate or that he has a clear and indisputable right to relief. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The petition is denied. FOR THE COURT June 18, 2020 Date s24 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
