HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS K.K. v. SEMICAPS PTE LTD. , No. 19-1890 (Fed. Cir. 2020)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 19-1890 Document: 57 Page: 1 Filed: 06/15/2020 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS K.K., Appellant v. SEMICAPS PTE LTD., Appellee ______________________ 2019-1890, 2019-1891 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR201702110, IPR2017-02112. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JARED WESTON NEWTON, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by RYAN SETH GOLDSTEIN, Los Angeles, CA; DAVID EISEMAN, IV, San Francisco, CA; KOICHIRO MINAMINO, Minamino Law Office, PLLC, Washington, DC. CAROLYN CHANG, Marton Ribera Schumann & Chang LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by HECTOR JULIAN RIBERA, RYAN J. MARTON. ______________________ Case: 19-1890 Document: 57 Page: 2 Filed: 06/15/2020 THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 15, 2020 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.