DSM DESOTECH INC. v. ITC , No. 18-2150 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DSM DESOTECH INC., DSM IP ASSETS B.V., Appellants v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee OFS FITEL, LLC, MOMENTIVE UV COATINGS (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD., Intervenors ______________________ 2018-2150 ______________________ Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-1031. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JAMES R. BARNEY, Finnegan, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by RAJEEV GUPTA, KARTHIK KUMAR. RONALD TRAUD, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DOMINIC L. BIANCHI, WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, MICHELLE W. KLANCNIK. BRADLEY JOHN OLSON, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor OFS Fitel, LLC. Also represented by CHRISTINE JULIET SOHAR HENTER, JORDAN WEINSTEIN. EDMOND R. BANNON, Fish & Richardson, P.C., New York, NY, argued for intervenor Momentive UV Coatings (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Also represented by AHMED JAMAL DAVIS, Washington, DC; RYAN PATRICK O'CONNOR, San Diego, CA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (WALLACH, CLEVENGER, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 9, 2019 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.