TREADWELL CORPORATION v. US [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] 6-13-2018, No. 17-2547 (Fed. Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ TREADWELL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2017-2547 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:17-cv-00287-LKG, Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ ANTHONY MARCHESE, The O'Riordan Bethel Law Firm, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffappellant. Also represented by CAROL L. O'RIORDAN. SEAN SIEKKINEN, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United States. Also represented by CHAD A. READLER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., DOUGLAS K. MICKLE; JONANTHAN DAVID PAVLOVCAK, GARY MICHAEL SALADINO, Office of Counsel, Naval Surface Warfare Center, United States Department of the Navy, Philadelphia, PA. JOHN CHIERICHELLA, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendantappellee Hamilton Sunstrand Corporation. Also represented by ADAM BARTOLANZO, KEITH SZELIGA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, WALLACH and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 13, 2018 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.