IN RE: PATTERSON , No. 17-2364 (Fed. Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: JAMES PATTERSON, NATHAN MOODY, Appellants ______________________ 2017-2364 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/103,813. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ ANDREW V. TRASK, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by JAMES SHERWOOD, Google LLC, Washington, DC. ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, MARY L. KELLY, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. The parties shall bear their own costs. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 10, 2018 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.