DIGITAL ALLY, INC. v. TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC. , No. 17-2296 (Fed. Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DIGITAL ALLY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2017-2296 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in No. 2:16-cv-02032-CM-TJJ, Judge Carlos Murguia. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JAMES F.B. DANIELS, McDowell, Rice, Smith & Buchanan, PC, Kansas City, MO, argued for plaintiffappellant. PAMELA BETH PETERSEN, Axon Enterprise, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JOHN D. GARRETSON, LYNN C. HERNDON, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Kansas City, MO. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (WALLACH, MAYER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 2, 2018 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.