PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. AIR LIQUIDE LARGE INDUSTRIES , No. 17-1318 (Fed. Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellant v. AIR LIQUIDE LARGE INDUSTRIES U.S. LP, Appellee ______________________ 2017-1318, 2017-1319 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2015-01071, IPR2015-01072. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Jones Day, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by DANIEL KAZHDAN; CHRISTOPHER J. HARNETT, KEVIN VINCENT MCCARTHY, New York, NY. STEPHANIE DEBROW, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by MARK T. GARRETT; CHARLES BRUCE WALKER, JR., Houston, TX; JONATHAN S. FRANKLIN, Washington, DC; ALLEN E. WHITE, Air Liquide, Houston, TX. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 13, 2018 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.