POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC. v. FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR , No. 16-2691 (Fed. Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on July 3, 2018.
Download PDF
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, FAIRCHILD (TAIWAN) CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellants ______________________ 2016-2691, 2017-1875 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:09-cv-05235MMC, Judge Maxine M. Chesney. ______________________ ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC ______________________ Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 2 POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC. v. FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR ORDER Appellee Power Integrations, Inc. filed a petition for rehearing. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by appellants Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corporation. The petition was first referred to the panel that heard the appeal. The panel granted the petition in part and denied it in part (see accompanying order). Thereafter, the petition was referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. (2) The mandate of this court will issue on October 29, 2018. FOR THE COURT September 20, 2018 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
