TEXAS ADVANCED OPTOELECTRONIC v. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA , No. 16-2121 (Fed. Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on May 1, 2018.
Download PDF
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ TEXAS ADVANCED OPTOELECTRONIC SOLUTIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., F/K/A INTERSIL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2016-2121, 2016-2208, 2016-2235 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 4:08-cv-00451-RAS, Judge Richard A. Schell. ______________________ ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC ______________________ Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, BRYSON *, DYK, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 2 TEXAS ADVANCED OPTOELECTRONIC v. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA ORDER Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant Texas Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions, Inc., (TAOS) filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc on June 14, 2018. The petition was referred to the panel that heard the appeal and was thereafter referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1) The petition for panel rehearing is granted in part and denied in part. See accompanying order. 2) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. 3) The mandate of this court will issue on August 15, 2018. FOR THE COURT July 9, 2018 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Circuit Judge Bryson participated only in the decision on the petition for panel rehearing. *
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
