NETAC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. v. SANDISK CORPORATION , No. 15-1630 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NETAC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., Appellant v. SANDISK CORPORATION, Appellee ______________________ 2015-1630 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 95/000,384. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ WENYE TAN, Anova Law Group, PLLC, Sterling, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by XIAOQUN WU. DARRYL J. ADAMS, Baker Botts, LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRIAN W. OAKS; RUSSELL J. CRAIN, Dallas, TX. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MAYER and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 9, 2016 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.