CLICK-TO-CALL TECHNOLOGIES, LP v. INGENIO, INC. , No. 15-1242 (Fed. Cir. 2020)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on November 12, 2015.

Download PDF
Case: 15-1242 Document: 135 Page: 1 Filed: 05/28/2020 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CLICK-TO-CALL TECHNOLOGIES, LP, Appellant v. INGENIO, INC., THRYV, INC., FKA DEX MEDIA, INC., FKA YELLOWPAGES.COM, LLC, Appellees ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________ 2015-1242 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR201300312. ______________________ SUA SPONTE ______________________ Case: 15-1242 Document: 135 Page: 2 CLICK-TO-CALL TECHNOLOGIES, LP 2 Filed: 05/28/2020 v. INGENIO, INC. Before O’MALLEY and TARANTO, Circuit Judges, and STARK, Chief District Judge *. PER CURIAM. ORDER Upon consideration of the judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States in Thryv, Inc., fka Dex Media, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP, et al., 140 S. Ct. 1367 (2020), vacating and remanding with instructions to dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The mandate of this court issued on October 9, 2018, is recalled, the appeal is reinstated, and this court’s August 16, 2018, judgment is vacated. (2) The official caption is revised as reflected above in light of the notice filed by Thryv, Inc. at the Supreme Court. (3) The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The mandate shall reissue forthwith. (4) Each party shall bear its own costs. FOR THE COURT May 28, 2020 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court The Honorable Leonard P. Stark, Chief District Judge, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, sitting by designation. *

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.