IN RE: RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY , No. 15-1170 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P., Appellant ______________________ 2015-1170 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 90/012,036. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ LOWELL D. MEAD, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by LORI R. MASON; FRANK V. PIETRANTONIO, Reston, VA. ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, STACY BETH MARGOLIES. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 15, 2015 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.