BENECKE-KALIKO AG v. THE HAARTZ CORPORATION , No. 15-1110 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BENECKE-KALIKO AG, Appellant v. THE HAARTZ CORPORATION, Appellee ______________________ 2015-1110 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/000,611. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ MARK D. KLINKO, Fay Sharpe, LLP, Cleveland, OH, argued for appellant. Also represented by JUDE A. FRY. STEVEN JAY GROSSMAN, Grossman Tucker Perreault & Pfleger, PLLC, Manchester, NH, argued for appellee. Also represented by BETH A. FILIP. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 15, 2015 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.