MACRO-Z TECHNOLOGY v. NAVY , No. 15-1025 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MACRO-Z TECHNOLOGY, Appellant v. RAYMOND E. MABUS, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, Appellee ______________________ 2015-1025 ______________________ Appeal from the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in No. 56711, Administrative Judge Mark A. Melnick, Administrative Judge David W. James, Jr., Administrative Judge Mark N. Stempler. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JAMES FRANCIS NAGLE, Oles Morrison Rinker & Baker LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for appellant. JAMES PATRICK CONNOR, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., BRYANT G. SNEE; ROBYN L. HAMADY, General Litigation Division, United States Department of the Navy, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and MOORE, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 13, 2015 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.