SHUKH v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC , No. 15-1012 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ALEXANDER SHUKH, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC, SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC., SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, Defendants-Appellees UNKNOWN OWNERS AND ASSIGNEES, Defendant SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2015-1012 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in No. 0:10-cv-00404-JRT-JJK, Judge John R. Tunheim. ______________________ Decided: October 2, 2015 ______________________ CONSTANTINE JOHN GEKAS, Gekas Law Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. 2 SHUKH v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC CHAD DROWN, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by DAVID J.F. GROSS, CHARLES FEENEY KNAPP, ELIZABETH COWAN WRIGHT, AARON D. VAN OORT; CALVIN L. LITSEY, East Palo Alto, CA. ______________________ Before MOORE, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In light of our holding in Shukh v. Seagate Technology, LLC, Case No. 14-1406, vacating and remanding in part the district court’s judgment on the merits against Alexander Shukh, we vacate and remand the district court’s costs judgment. VACATED AND REMANDED COSTS No costs.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
