KATSOUROS v. OAC , No. 14-6001 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ANTHONY KATSOUROS, Petitioner v. OFFICE OF THE ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL, OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE, Respondents ______________________ 2014-6001 ______________________ Petition for review of a decision of the Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance in No. 09-AC-10. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JEFFREY HOWARD LEIB, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. IMRAN RAZA ZAIDI, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent Office of the Architect of the Capitol. Also represented by STUART F. DELERY and MARLEIGH D. DOVER. JOHN UELMEN, Office of the General Counsel, Office of Compliance, Washington, DC, argued for respondent Office of Compliance. Also represented by AMY VICTORIA DUNNING. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (TARANTO, CLEVENGER, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 10, 2015 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.