BOBEL v. ITC , No. 14-1701 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ANDRZEJ BOBEL, NEPTUN LIGHT, INC., Appellants v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee SATCO PRODUCTS, INC., MAXLITE, INC., LITETRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Intervenors ______________________ 2014-1701 ______________________ Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-872. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ SUDIP KUMAR KUNDU, The Fuisz-Kundu Group LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by JOHN ROBERT FUISZ. ROBERT JOHN NEEDHAM, Office of General Counsel, International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, BIANCHI. SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG, DOMINIC L. ROBERT STEPHEN RIGG, Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz, Chicago, IL, argued for intervenors. Intervenors Litetronics International, Inc., MaxLite, Inc., also represented by TIMOTHY MICHAEL NITSCH. Intervenor Satco Products, Inc., represented by ROBERT P. LYNN, JR., STEPHEN WILLIAM LIVINGSTON, Lynn, Gartner, Dunne & Covello, LLP, Mineola, NY. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 14, 2015 Date /s/Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.