WRIGHT MANUFACTURING, INC. v. THE TORO COMPANY , No. 14-1534 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WRIGHT MANUFACTURING, INC., Appellant v. THE TORO COMPANY, Appellee ______________________ 2014-1534, 2014-1558 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/001,741, 95/001,442. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JOSEPH A. RHOA, Nixon & Vanderhye P.C., Arlington, VA, argued for appellant. RACHEL C. HUGHEY, Merchant & Gould P.C., Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellee. Also represented by ANTHONY RICHARD ZEULI, KATHERINE E. MULLER. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (REYNA, SCHALL, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 12, 2015 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.