GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES v. WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION , No. 14-1421 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION, WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., WESTERN DIGITAL (FREMONT) INC., WESTERN DIGITAL (THAILAND) COMPANY LIMITED, AND WESTERN DIGITAL (MALAYSIA) SDN.BHD., Defendants-Appellees. ______________________ 2014-1421 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:11-cv-03786-PSG, Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ A. MARISA CHUN, McDermott, Will & Emery, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief were DANIEL E. ALBERTI and ERIC W. HAGEN. Of counsel were M. MILLER BAKER, of Washington, DC, and NATALIE A. BENNETT, of Chicago, Illinois. DOUGLAS E. LUMISH, Latham & Watkins, LLP, of Menlo Park, California argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were RICHARD G. FRENKEL and MICHELLE P. WOODHOUSE; and JAMES L. DAY, of San Francisco, CA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, BRYSON, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 9, 2015 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.