IN RE: TECHSHELL, INC. , No. 14-1179 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE TECHSHELL, INC. ______________________ 2014-1179 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination No. 95/001,767. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ ROBERT B. DULANEY, III, Smith Risley Tempel Santos, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for appellant. On the brief was SCOTT A. HORSTEMEYER, Thomas|Horstemeyer LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia. Of counsel were NORMAN A. CRAIN and DAN R. GRESHAM. MEREDITH H. SCHOENFELD, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for intervenor. With her on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and MONICA B. LATEEF, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, TARANTO and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 17, 2014 Date /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.