MASTEROBJECTS, INC. v. GOOGLE INC. , No. 14-1148 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MASTEROBJECTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________ 2014-1148 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:11-cv-01054-PJH, Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ SPENCER HOSIE, Hosie Rice LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were DIANE SUE RICE and GEORGE F. BISHOP. Of counsel on the brief were LESLIE V. PAYNE, NATHAN J. DAVIS and ALDEN G. HARRIS, Heim, Payne & Chorush, LLP, of Houston, Texas. DAN L. BAGATELL, Perkins Coie LLP, of Phoenix, Arizona, argued for defendant-appellee. Of counsel on the brief were JEFFREY J. TONEY, JONATHAN K. WALDROP and DARCY L. JONES, Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia; and STEVEN C. CARLSON and ROBERT P. WATKINS, III, of Redwood Shores, California. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: es). PER CURIAM (DYK, PLAGER, and MOORE, Circuit JudgAFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 10, 2014 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.